All articles
AI Act

AI Act for Medical Devices: Deadlines & Omnibus Tracker

A living tracker of the EU AI Act application dates for medical devices, and how the Digital Omnibus is changing them. The classification logic (Article 6(1), 43(3)) is stable; the dates are not. Treat every deadline here as provisional and check back. Cited.

Pedram Madani4 min read
Share

AI Act for Medical Devices: Deadlines & Omnibus Tracker

Why this page exists

Our medical-AI guides deliberately avoid hard-coding deadlines, because the dates for AI in medical devices are moving. This page is where those volatile details live. Treat everything here as provisional and check the status column. The durable part, the classification logic in Is my medical AI high-risk? (Article 6(1) and 43(3)), does not change with the calendar.

Last reviewed: 9 July 2026.

The timeline (provisional)

DateWhat appliesStatus
1 Aug 2024AI Act entered into forceIn effect
2 Feb 2025Prohibited practices (Article 5) applyIn effect
2 Aug 2025GPAI model obligations beginIn effect
2 Aug 2026Most high-risk obligations (Annex III route) applyApproaching
2 Aug 2027Original date for high-risk AI in Annex I products (medical devices)Being moved
2 Aug 2028Proposed new date for AI in Annex I products (medical devices)Proposed (Digital Omnibus)

The row that matters most for medtech is the last two: the obligations for AI embedded in products covered by Annex I, which includes medical devices under the MDR/IVDR, phase in later than the rest of the Act, and the Digital Omnibus would push that date out further.

Is your AI system high-risk?

Find out in 2 minutes, free, no signup required.

Take the free assessment

What the Digital Omnibus changes

The Digital Omnibus was presented by the European Commission on 19 November 2025, and a provisional agreement between the Council and Parliament followed in 2026. For medical devices it would, per the Council:

  • Move the application date for AI in Annex I products (medical devices included) to 2 August 2028.
  • Narrow the "safety component" definition, so AI used purely for non-safety functions is less likely to be pulled into high-risk by virtue of being embedded in a regulated product.
  • Empower the Commission to limit AI Act requirements where the MDR/IVDR already imposes equivalent obligations, reducing duplication.

Some proposals go further on where medical devices sit within Annex I, which would affect how many AI Act requirements apply directly. Until the package is finally adopted, the exact dates and scope are not settled.

What this means for your planning

  • Build to the logic, not the date. Whether the deadline is 2027 or 2028, the trigger (notified body → high-risk) and the integrated route (Article 43(3)) are the same. Design your conformity around those.
  • Do not stall. Notified-body capacity and technical documentation take time; the extra runway is for readiness, not delay. See notified bodies and AI medical devices.
  • Watch the safety-component and duplication changes. They could reduce what applies to you, which is a reason to design flexibly, not to assume the burden disappears.

For the full picture of what applies once you are in scope, see the medical-AI high-risk guide and the AI Act × MDR/IVDR crosswalk.

FAQ

When do AI Act obligations apply to medical devices?

Later than the rest of the Act. The original date for AI in Annex I products (which includes medical devices) was 2 August 2027, and the Digital Omnibus proposes moving it to 2 August 2028. Treat the exact date as provisional until the package is finally adopted.

Is the 2 August 2027 deadline still valid?

It is being moved. The Digital Omnibus proposes 2 August 2028 for AI in Annex I products. Because the package is not yet final, plan to the classification logic and track the date here.

Does the Digital Omnibus reduce what applies to medical devices?

Possibly. It would narrow the "safety component" definition and let the Commission limit AI Act requirements where the MDR/IVDR already imposes equivalent obligations. The extent depends on the final text.

Should I wait for the dates to settle before starting?

No. The classification logic and the integrated conformity route are stable, and readiness (notified-body scope, technical documentation, data governance) takes time. Use the runway to prepare, not to delay.

Sources (official)

Legalithm provides compliance information and tooling, not legal advice. Dates and scope are provisional and change; confirm current status with official sources and qualified counsel. Article references are to Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the AI Act).

AI Act
Deadlines
Digital Omnibus
Medical Devices
MDR
Timeline