Trust scoreboard
Legalithm claims to be current, cited and provably maintained. This page is where that gets checked rather than asserted. Every figure below is computed from files in the repository, and every figure that cannot be is marked not yet measured rather than estimated.
4 computed, 5 not yet measured. The blanks are the honest part. An accuracy percentage with no source behind it is worse than no number, so none is published here until it can be sourced.
Measured
- EAA pack freshness
- 4 days since last revision
- CRA pack freshness
- 4 days since last revision
- Independent review coverage
- 0 of 292 subjects reviewed (0%)
- Corrections published
- 1 in 5 days of corpus history
corpus/eu-eaa/changelog.json, latest entry 2026-08-14
corpus/eu-cra/changelog.json, latest entry 2026-08-14
lib/eaa/review/provenance.json. A review is a commit to that file.
Entries in the corpus changelogs whose summary records a correction.
Not yet measured
Shown, not hidden. Each row names what would fill it.
- Correction rate, per 100 obligations per quarter
- not yet measured
- Ambiguity rate, where the pack declines to determine
- not yet measured
- Expert agreement rate
- not yet measured
- False-positive rate
- not yet measured
- False-negative rate
- not yet measured
Needs a quarter of history. The corpora were first published in August 2026, and annualising days would invent the number this page exists to refuse.
No field in either corpus records a declined determination. The hypothesis/claim split exists in the product database and is not read here.
Needs a named external reviewer. Ten were approached on 17 August 2026; the one who replied priced it as paid consulting.
Needs a labelled set of assessments with known-correct outcomes. None exists.
Needs the same labelled set.
Every correction Legalithm has published is in the rules changelog. Which frameworks are tracked and what applies when is on the pack roadmap.