Criteria for assessment of disproportionate burden
Binds
economic operators
Applies from
Evidence
document
Annex VI: Criteria for assessment of disproportionate burden
all operators · Annex VI
Criteria to carry out and document the assessment:
How to satisfy it: Three criteria. All financial or organisational, so this artefact needs NO accessibility testing and is authorable and sellable ahead of any Annex I work.
Ratio of the net costs of compliance with accessibility requirements to the overall costs (operating and capital expenditures) of manufacturing, distributing or importing the product or providing the service for the economic operators. Elements to use to assess the net costs of compliance with accessibility requirements:
How to satisfy it: Turnover is not the denominator here — overall operating and capital expenditure is. Criterion 3 is the turnover ratio.
The estimated costs and benefits for the economic operators, including production processes and investments, in relation to the estimated benefit for persons with disabilities, taking into account the amount and frequency of use of the specific product or service.
How to satisfy it: The benefit comparison the operator does not control: it is weighed against the estimated benefit to persons with disabilities, by amount and frequency of use.
Ratio of the net costs of compliance with accessibility requirements to the net turnover of the economic operator. Elements to use to assess the net costs of compliance with accessibility requirements:
How to satisfy it: Net compliance cost against net turnover, which is why a profitable company cannot argue absolute cost.
No harmonised standard is cited in the Official Journal under this Directive, so the Article 15(1) presumption of conformity is available to nobody. EN 301 549 is harmonised under Directive (EU) 2016/2102, the Web Accessibility Directive, and not under this one. Conformity is demonstrated against Annex I directly.
Every quoted requirement on this page is verbatim Official Journal text. The surrounding guidance is Legalithm’s commentary and is not regulation. This page states the obligation and its legal basis; it is not legal advice, and the corpus has not been reviewed by counsel.